Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is way better than the LG K50, with an 89 score against 72.2. Galaxy Note10 is a just a little bit lighter and a bit thinner cellphone than LG K50, although they were released only a few months apart. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a more vivid screen than LG K50, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy Note10 also has a higher pixel number in each inch in the screen and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a little better performance than LG K50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM. The Galaxy Note10 has a superior camera than LG K50, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less megapixels, it also counts with a bigger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with just a bit bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG K50, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note10's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery life in LG K50.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.