Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note3 has a score of 77.7, which is slightly better than the LG K50's general score of 72.2. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy Note3 has older 4.4.2 version and LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy Note3's construction is a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the LG K50, although it was released many years before.
LG K50 features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the LG K50 also has 4 more processing cores (although slower). Galaxy Note3 has a slightly better looking screen than LG K50, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per display inch and a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution.
The Galaxy Note3 captures clearer videos and photos than LG K50, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a smaller sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have a F2.2 aperture, the Galaxy Note3 also counts with a lot better video quality. LG K50 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The LG K50 counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 9 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.