Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-20 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is a lot better than LG K50, with an 88.3 score against 72.2. Although Samsung Galaxy S10 and LG K50 were released only 5 months apart, Samsung Galaxy S10 is just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has the previous 11 version and LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a much better looking display than LG K50, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater pixels count per inch in the display and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3040px. Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a little bit better performance than LG K50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 takes much better photographs and videos than LG K50, because although it has a lot lower 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor shooting higher quality photos, a much bigger aperture and a way higher video definition. The Galaxy S10 has a bigger memory for apps and games than LG K50, because although it has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG K50 features a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 3% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.