Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-20 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a score of 93.6, which is much better than LG K50's 72.2 general score. These phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has the older 11 version while LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G body is somewhat heavier but just a bit thinner than LG K50, and both were released with only 3 months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features just a bit better performance than LG K50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has 5 GB more RAM. Galaxy S10 5G counts with a way better looking display than LG K50, because it has a bit bigger display, a way higher screen density and a way better 1440 x 3040 resolution.
The Galaxy S10 5G shoots better photographs and videos than LG K50, because although it has a way less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution, a way larger aperture and a bigger sensor. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG K50, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has superior battery performance than LG K50, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.