Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is a lot better than the LG K50's general score of 72.2. The Galaxy S10 Lite construction is just a bit thinner but a little bit heavier than the LG K50, and both were released only a couple of months apart. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a little bit better hardware performance than LG K50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a more vivid display than LG K50, because it has a quite bigger display, a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution and more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy S10 Lite features a much bigger memory for apps and games than LG K50, because although it has an external SD slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has longer battery performance than LG K50, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Galaxy S10 Lite takes way better photographs and videos than LG K50, because it has a way larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a back facing camera with a much better resolution, a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.