Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is much better than the LG K50, with an 86.3 score against 72.2. Galaxy S10e is a just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter phone than LG K50, even when both of them were released only a couple of months apart. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a bit better CPU than LG K50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10e features a sharper display than LG K50, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way greater pixels quantity per inch of display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2280px. Samsung Galaxy S10e takes much better pictures and videos than LG K50, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much larger diafragm aperture, a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and pictures and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG K50, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. LG K50 features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.