Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is a lot better than LG K50, getting a 94.8 score against 72.2. The Galaxy S20 construction is just a little lighter and a little thinner than LG K50, even when they were released only a couple of months apart. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 has older 13 version and LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a much more vibrant display than LG K50, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a way better display pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG K50, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S20 features a bit more powerful CPU than LG K50, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 has just a bit longer battery duration than LG K50, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The Galaxy S20 has a better camera than LG K50, because although it has a way lower 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a much bigger camera sensor and a larger aperture to take better low-light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.