Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is a lot better than the LG K50's 72.2 overall score. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has older 13 version while LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an a little bit thicker and heavier cellphone than the LG K50.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot better screen than LG K50, because it has a much greater pixel density, a little bit bigger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3200. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than LG K50, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better performance than LG K50, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 9 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than LG K50, because it has a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and video, a much higher video definition, a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality and a way higher 108 megapixels resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior battery lifetime than LG K50, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.