Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 has a global score of 93.4, which is a lot better than LG K50's 72.2 global score. The Galaxy S22 body is much newer, just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than LG K50. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 has the previous 13 version and LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a bit better CPU than LG K50, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a much better display than LG K50, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a much greater screen pixels density.
LG K50 features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a bit superior battery duration than LG K50, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a very superior camera than LG K50, because it has a larger aperture, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.