Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-20 | -- |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.07 ounces | -- |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is better than the LG K50, with an 82.6 score against 72.2. Galaxy S25's construction is a lot thinner and much lighter than LG K50. Both devices in this review include Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 has the older 14 version and LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy S25 counts with an incredibly better looking screen than LG K50, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and way more pixels per screen inch.
The LG K50 features a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 takes way better videos and photos than LG K50, because it has a much higher video definition, a lot larger camera sensor, a bigger diafragm aperture and a way more megapixels camera in the back.
LG K50 features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S25 features just a bit better battery life than LG K50, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.