Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has a global score of 79.5, which is better than the LG K50's general score of 72.2. The Galaxy S7 is an notably older device than the LG K50, but it is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. LG K50 counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores (although slower).
Samsung Galaxy S7 has a much better looking display than LG K50, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater pixels amount per inch of screen and a much better 1440 x 2560px resolution. The LG K50 has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG K50 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG K50 features just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S7 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than LG K50, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality, a lot higher video resolution and a lot larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.