Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is a bit better than LG K50, having a 75.8 score against 72.2. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's construction is noticeably older, just a bit heavier and thicker than LG K50. The LG K50 has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
Galaxy S7 Active has a lot better screen than LG K50, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better screen pixel density and a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution. LG K50 features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal storage capacity, the LG K50 also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than LG K50, because it has a 14% bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active takes a little bit better photos and videos than LG K50, because although it has a lot less mega pixels back camera, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.