Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-08-20 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 edge has an overall score of 78.1, which is slightly better than the LG K50's overall score of 72.2. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S7 edge has 8.0 Oreo version and LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy S7 edge design is somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than the LG K50, although it was released many years before.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge features a better looking display than LG K50, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a much better screen density. The LG K50 counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge captures a little bit better videos and photos than LG K50, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a much bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures, a bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality and a much better video quality.
The LG K50 has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG K50 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge counts with just a little better battery life than LG K50, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.