Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is better than LG K50's score of 72.2. Both devices we are comparing here have Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has an older 11 version while LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy XCover Pro design is thicker and noticeably heavier than the LG K50.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a sharper display than LG K50, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has way more pixels per inch in the screen and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit better performance than LG K50, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro shoots slightly better pictures and videos than LG K50, because although it has a much smaller back-facing camera sensor which gives a much worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a lot bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
LG K50 has just a bit bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with improved battery duration than LG K50, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.