Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is way better than the LG K50, with a general score of 88.5 against 72.2. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip and LG K50 were only released with a couple of months difference, Galaxy Z Flip's design is just a little heavier but also thinner. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version while LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better processing power than LG K50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 5 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a brighter screen than LG K50, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution, a much greater number of pixels per inch of display and a little bigger screen.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a superior camera than LG K50, because although it has a much worse resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture, a bigger sensor taking higher quality pictures and videos and a lot better video resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG K50, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The LG K50 features just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 6% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.