Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-05-06 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.57 x 3.07 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.17 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 174.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 264 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is a bit better than LG K51, having a global score of 77.7 against 71.1. HTC One M9 is a notably older and thicker cellphone than LG K51, but HTC was able to build it noticeably lighter anyway. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the HTC One M9 has the previous 5.0 version and LG K51 has Android 10.
The HTC One M9 features a much better display than LG K51, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a much greater count of pixels per screen inch. HTC One M9 features a bit faster CPU than LG K51, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC One M9 also has a 64 bits CPU and an additional graphics processing unit.
The HTC One M9 captures a lot better photographs and videos than LG K51, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor, a back facing camera with a lot higher 20 megapixels resolution and a lot higher video definition.
The LG K51 has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the LG K51 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG K51 counts with a superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 41% greater battery capacity.
The HTC One M9 is a little more expensive than LG K51, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.