Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.2 |
| 2020-05-06 | 2014-05-27 |
| 6.57 x 3.07 x 0.33 inches | 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.17 ounces | 5.26 ounces |
| Titan gray | Black, Gold, Pink, Purple and White |
| $ 174.00 | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 264 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.40 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 548 hours standby time 19 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G3 has a score of 76.4, which is just a bit better than LG K51's 71.1 score. Despite of the fact LG G3 is much older and a little bit thicker than the LG K51, it's construction is still extremely lighter. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS, but LG G3 has the older 5.0 version and LG K51 has Android 10.
LG G3 features a much sharper screen than LG K51, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a way better pixels amount per inch in the display. The LG K51 counts with much more storage for applications and games than LG G3, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal storage, the LG K51 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G3 counts with a little better hardware performance than LG K51, because although it has 4 less cores , and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the LG G3 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. LG K51 counts with longer battery lifetime than LG G3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
LG G3 takes better pictures and videos than LG K51, because although it has a much smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and videos in low-light situations and a tinier sensor capturing worse quality images, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the LG G3 also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the LG G3 is also cheaper than the LG K51.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.