Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-06 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.57 x 3.07 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.17 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Titan gray | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 174.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 264 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is better than the LG K51, getting a general score of 81 against 71.1. Despite of the fact that LG G7 ThinQ is older than LG K51, it's body is a little bit thinner and notably lighter. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but the LG G7 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while LG K51 has Android 10 version.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much more vibrant screen than LG K51, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a lot better 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG G7 ThinQ has a quite bigger storage for applications and games than LG K51, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG G7 ThinQ also has 32 GB more internal storage capacity.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with just a little better hardware performance than LG K51, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. The LG K51 counts with greater battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. LG G7 ThinQ captures much better pictures and videos than LG K51, because although it has a smaller sensor taking lower quality videos and images, it also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution, a higher resolution camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures in poorly lited environments.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG G7 ThinQ is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.