Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than LG K51S, having a overall score of 80 against 74.3. Google Pixel 3 is an older cellphone than the LG K51S, but it's a lot lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. Google Pixel 3 features just a little better processing power than LG K51S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 3 features a much better screen than LG K51S, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater count of pixels per inch in the display and a way higher 1080 x 2160 resolution. Google Pixel 3 features just a bit better camera than LG K51S, because although it has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition.
The LG K51S features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG K51S also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 2 TB. The LG K51S counts with a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 37 percent more battery size.
The Google Pixel 3 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.