Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 270 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is just a bit better than the LG K51S, having a 77.7 score against 74.3. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version and LG K51S has Android 10 version. The HTC One M9 is a way older and thicker cellphone than LG K51S, but HTC was able to make it somewhat lighter anyway.
The HTC One M9 features a much better looking screen than LG K51S, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a much higher screen pixel density. The HTC One M9 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than LG K51S, and although they both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount, the HTC One M9 also has a 64-bits processing unit and a GPU.
LG K51S has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB and 32 GB more internal storage. LG K51S features a way better battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2840mAh.
HTC One M9 has a better camera than LG K51S, because although it has a much less mega pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
HTC One M9 is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.