Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-27 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Black and Gray |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.74 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit has a global score of 77, which is a little bit better than LG K51S's global score of 74.3. These devices come with Android operating system, but the LG G7 Fit has 8.1 Oreo version while LG K51S has Android 10 version, so it provides you a couple nice extra features. The LG G7 Fit is an older phone than LG K51S, but LG was able to build it somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a much better display than LG K51S, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a way greater pixel count per screen inch. The LG K51S features a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that allows up to 2 TB.
LG K51S counts with a little bit better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores. LG K51S has better battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. LG G7 Fit captures slightly better photos and videos than LG K51S, because although it has a way less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.