Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-04-27 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is much better than the LG K51S's 74.3 score. These phones work with Android operating system, but the LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while LG K51S has Android 10 version. The LG V30S ThinQ is an older phone than the LG K51S, but it is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner anyway.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a brighter display than LG K51S, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater screen density and a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with more memory for apps and games than LG K51S, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows 48 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than LG K51S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ takes much clearer videos and photos than LG K51S, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
LG K51S has longer battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 21% bigger battery capacity.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG K51S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG K51S. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the LG K51S, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.