Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a general score of 81.2, which is a bit better than LG K51S's general score of 74.3. The LG V40 ThinQ is an older phone than LG K51S, but it is just a bit thinner and lighter anyway. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 operating system, so they should offer very similar operating system features.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a much sharper display than LG K51S, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a lot more pixels per inch in the display. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than LG K51S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
The LG K51S features just a bit more storage capacity for applications and games than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG K51S also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 2 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ captures better photos and videos than LG K51S, because although it has a back camera with way less MP, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
The LG K51S counts with better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V40 ThinQ costs a bit more money than LG K51S, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.