Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than LG K51S, having an 87.1 score against 74.3. The LG Velvet is a just a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner phone than LG K51S, even though they were released with only a few months difference. The LG Velvet counts with a sharper screen than LG K51S, because it has a higher pixel count per inch in the screen, a much higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a quite larger display.
LG Velvet has a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG K51S, because although it has a SD card slot that holds 48 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. LG Velvet features a little bit better hardware performance than LG K51S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has a greater amount of RAM.
The LG Velvet features a bit superior battery life than LG K51S, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity. The LG Velvet features a very superior camera than LG K51S, because it has a back facing camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
LG Velvet costs more than LG K51S, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.