Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than LG K51S, getting a score of 87.1 against 74.3. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version and LG K51S has Android 10. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is notably newer than the LG K51S's, although it's just a bit heavier and a little bit thicker.
LG K51S has a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot better screen than LG K51S, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a higher pixel density and a quite bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better memory capacity to install games and applications than LG K51S, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit longer battery performance than LG K51S, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures a lot better photographs and videos than LG K51S, because it has a much better video definition and a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.