Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-27 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z3 is slightly better than LG K51S, having a global score of 77.6 against 74.3. Motorola Moto Z3 is an older phone than the LG K51S, but it is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. These phones use Android OS, but the Motorola Moto Z3 has the newer 9.0 Pie version while LG K51S has Android 10 version.
Moto Z3 has a much better display than LG K51S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a higher number of pixels per inch in the display. LG K51S features a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG K51S also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB.
Motorola Moto Z3 features a little bit better performance than LG K51S, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has more RAM. The Moto Z3 shoots clearer photos and videos than LG K51S, because although it has a back camera with a way lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
LG K51S has improved battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Moto Z3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG K51S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG K51S. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy LG K51S, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.