Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-27 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has an overall score of 76.9, which is slightly better than the LG K51S's 74.3 general score. Both of these devices come with the same Android 10 operating system, so both should give all the same OS features. Although Samsung Galaxy A70 is older than the LG K51S, it's construction is just a little lighter and just a bit thinner.
The LG K51S features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has 3 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy A70 counts with a bit better screen than LG K51S, because it has a quite larger display, more pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The LG K51S has a lot better camera than Galaxy A70. Both of them have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate. The LG K51S counts with a slightly bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy A70, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 2 TB.
The Galaxy A70 features a bit superior battery duration than LG K51S, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy A70 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG K51S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG K51S. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A70, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the LG K51S, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.