Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-04-27 | -- |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 11 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Alpha has a global score of 76.3, which is a bit better than LG K51S's 74.3 score. Samsung Galaxy Alpha is a lighter and notably thinner device than the LG K51S. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Alpha has 4.4.4 version while LG K51S has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy Alpha features a much better looking display than LG K51S, because although it has a bit lower 1280 x 720 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixels quantity per inch in the screen. LG K51S has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 2 TB and more internal memory.
Galaxy Alpha counts with a bit better hardware performance than LG K51S, because although it has 4 lesser processing cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processor. The LG K51S has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1860mAh.
The Galaxy Alpha counts with just a bit better camera than LG K51S, because although it has a lot less megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Although Galaxy Alpha is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG K51S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG K51S. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Alpha, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG K51S, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.