Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 is slightly better than LG K51S, getting a overall score of 80.2 against 74.3. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 is an much older cellphone than the LG K51S, but Samsung was able to build it a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. The LG K51S has a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note5, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 features a better looking display than LG K51S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a lot more pixels per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 features a much better camera than LG K51S, because although it has a camera in the back with way less mega-pixels, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
LG K51S has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG K51S also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 2 TB. LG K51S counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.