Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-27 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is much better than LG K51S, with a global score of 88.3 against 74.3. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has newer 11 version and LG K51S has Android 10, providing you some additional features and enhanced performance. Although Samsung Galaxy S10 is older than the LG K51S, it's design is a little thinner and somewhat lighter.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a little better processing power than LG K51S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S10 also has more RAM. The Galaxy S10 features a much better display than LG K51S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a much greater number of pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy S10 captures better videos and photos than LG K51S, because although it has a way lower 12 MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way better video quality. The LG K51S counts with a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S10, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 2 TB.
LG K51S has improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has an 18% greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 costs a lot more money than the LG K51S, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.