Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is much better than LG K51S, with a 93.4 score against 74.3. These devices include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version and LG K51S has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a newer cellphone, and it is also lighter and just a little bit thinner than LG K51S.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a much better looking screen than LG K51S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better display pixels density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Galaxy S22 has a little faster CPU than LG K51S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S22 has a much better camera than LG K51S, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back facing camera with a lot better 50 MP resolution. LG K51S has a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 2 TB.
The LG K51S counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG K51S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG K51S. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG K51S, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.