Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than LG K51S, with a 95.4 score against 74.3. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version while LG K51S has Android 10, providing the user a lot of extra features. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer cellphone than LG K51S, although it's a little bit thicker and heavier.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much sharper screen than LG K51S, because it has a way greater pixels count per display inch, a way better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a little bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little bit better hardware performance than LG K51S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better camera than LG K51S, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera in the back with way more megapixels. LG K51S has a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 2 TB.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with superior battery performance than LG K51S, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG K51S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG K51S. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S22 Ultra, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG K51S, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.