Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 is just a bit better than LG K51S, getting a 79.5 score against 74.3. The Galaxy S7 is an older cellphone than LG K51S, but it's extremely lighter and a bit thinner anyway. The Galaxy S7 counts with a much sharper display than LG K51S, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a lot better pixels amount per screen inch and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
LG K51S counts with a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 2 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. The LG K51S counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
LG K51S has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S7, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S7 features a bit better camera than LG K51S, because although it has a way less mega pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy S7 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.