Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than the LG K51S, having an 81 score against 74.3. Even though the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better phone than LG K51S, we must highlight that it's also somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. These phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a newer 11 version while LG K51S has Android 10 version, so it provides the user lots of additional features and a performance increase.
The Galaxy XCover Pro and LG K51S have incredibly similar processors, and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a better screen than LG K51S, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a much greater pixels density.
The LG K51S has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG K51S also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 2 TB. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better battery lifetime than LG K51S, because it has a 1 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit better camera than LG K51S, although it has a back-facing camera with a much lower 25 mega pixels resolution and a worse (Full HD) video definition.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG K51S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG K51S. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy LG K51S, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.