Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than the LG K51S, getting a score of 87.9 against 74.3. Even being the best cellphone we are comparing, we must highlight that it is also somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both should provide the user identical OS features.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit faster CPU than LG K51S, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has 3 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a better display than LG K51S, because it has a greater pixels amount in each inch in the screen, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bigger display.
LG K51S counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 2 TB. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features greater battery life than LG K51S, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots a lot better videos and photos than LG K51S, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.