Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-23 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS has an overall score of 84.2, which is much better than the LG K52's 76 general score. Despite of the fact that the iPhone XS is older than LG K52, it's construction is just a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter. The Apple iPhone XS has a much more vibrant screen than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better display pixels density and a lot better resolution of 1125 x 2436px.
The LG K52 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG K52 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Apple iPhone XS has a better performing processor than LG K52, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bit processor.
LG K52 has a very superior battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Apple iPhone XS shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than LG K52, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse resolution and a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have a same size aperture, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a lot better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.