Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-23 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is a little bit better than LG K52's 76 general score. Although Google Pixel 3 is notably older than LG K52, it's construction is a little bit thinner and a lot lighter. The Google Pixel 3 has a more vivid display than LG K52, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2160 resolution and a much greater display density.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a little better performance than LG K52. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor. LG K52 has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG K52 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG K52 captures clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same video frame rate and the same aperture, the LG K52 also has a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a way larger camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs.
LG K52 counts with a much better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.