Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-11-23 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is just a bit better than LG K52, with a score of 78.8 against 76. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 3a has a newer 11 version while LG K52 has Android 10, counting with a lot of extra features. Google Pixel 3a's construction is notably lighter and just a bit thinner than LG K52, although it was released just 19 months before.
Google Pixel 3a has a sharper display than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2220 resolution and way more pixels per display inch. The LG K52 has a little faster processor than Google Pixel 3a. Both of them have 8 cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The LG K52 has much more storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG K52 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG K52 captures a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate, the LG K52 also has a camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a lot larger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The LG K52 has superior battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.