Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-23 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than the LG K52's overall score of 76. Google Pixel 4 is an older phone than LG K52, but Google was able to build it a little thinner and lighter. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better processing power than LG K52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a much better looking screen than LG K52, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a way greater pixels quantity per inch in the display. LG K52 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the LG K52 also counts with a much bigger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs and a camera with lot more megapixels.
LG K52 features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG K52 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG K52 features a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.