Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-23 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the LG K52's global score of 76. Google Pixel 4 XL's design is a little bit thinner than LG K52, although it's just a little bit heavier and was released about 13 months before. Google Pixel 4 XL features a much more vibrant display than LG K52, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a much higher pixels density.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit better performance than LG K52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has more RAM memory. LG K52 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the LG K52 also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a way bigger sensor.
The LG K52 has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG K52 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG K52 counts with a little better battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an 8% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.