Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-23 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is a little bit better than the LG K52, with an 82.9 score against 76. Even when the Google Pixel 4a and LG K52 were released with only a couple of months difference, the Google Pixel 4a is just a little bit thinner and incredibly lighter. These phones use Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a has 11 version and LG K52 has Android 10 version.
Google Pixel 4a features a more vivid display than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a much higher pixel count per inch of screen. The LG K52 has a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG K52 and Google Pixel 4a both feature extremely similar processors, and although the Google Pixel 4a has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. LG K52 counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the LG K52 also counts with a much more MP camera in the back and a much larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The LG K52 counts with better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.