Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-23 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is better than LG K52, with a general score of 89 against 76. The Google Pixel 5 is a lighter and just a little bit thinner cellphone than LG K52, even when both of them were only released 1 months apart. Google Pixel 5 has just a bit better hardware performance than LG K52, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 5 has a sharper screen than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a way greater display pixels density. The LG K52 counts with much more storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 5 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than LG K52, because although it has a lot tinier camera sensor taking much worse quality videos and photographs and a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited situations and a way higher video quality.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit superior battery life than LG K52, because it has a 2% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.