Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.2 |
| 2020-11-23 | 2014-05-27 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.26 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black, Gold, Pink, Purple and White |
| -- | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 266 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.40 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 548 hours standby time 19 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G3 has a general score of 76.4, which is just a bit better than LG K52's general score of 76. LG G3's body is lighter than the LG K52, but it's just a little bit thicker and was released many years before. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G3 has an older 5.0 version while LG K52 has Android 10 version.
LG G3 counts with a bit better hardware performance than LG K52, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and lesser CPU cores , it also counts with an additional GPU. LG G3 features a much better looking display than LG K52, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a lot higher screen density.
The LG K52 counts with much more memory to store more games and applications than LG G3, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory. LG K52 has improved battery lifetime than LG G3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. LG K52 shoots slightly better videos and photos than LG G3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the LG K52 also has a much better resolution camera, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a way bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.