Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-11-23 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 266 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 Fit is just a bit better than LG K52, with a 77 score against 76. Both devices in this comparison review have Android operating system, but LG G7 Fit has the newer 8.1 Oreo version while LG K52 has Android 10 version. LG G7 Fit's design is lighter and just a bit thinner than LG K52, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
LG G7 Fit features a way better display than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch of display and a much better 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG K52 counts with more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG K52 also has 64 GB internal storage.
The LG K52 features a bit superior processor than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the LG K52 also has more CPU cores. LG K52 counts with improved battery performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. LG K52 counts with a little bit better camera than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the LG K52 also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light captures, a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.