Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-11-23 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 266 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ has a general score of 81, which is slightly better than the LG K52's 76 global score. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (Operating System), but LG G7 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version and LG K52 has Android 10, counting with lots of additional features. Although LG G7 ThinQ is much older than LG K52, it's body is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much more vibrant screen than LG K52, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater display pixels density and a lot higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG G7 ThinQ's storage capacity to install applications and games is just as good as LG K52's one, both of them have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a bit better processing power than LG K52. They have 8 CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM. The LG K52 features improved battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. LG G7 ThinQ has a little bit better camera than LG K52, because although it has a way smaller back camera sensor shooting way lower quality videos and photographs and a camera with way less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.