Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-11-23 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is slightly better than the LG K52, having a general score of 82.5 against 76. LG V30S ThinQ is an older cellphone than LG K52, but it is somewhat thinner and lighter anyway. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while LG K52 has Android 10, so it counts with some extra features and increased performance.
LG V30S ThinQ has a bit better processing unit than LG K52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG V30S ThinQ features a more vivid screen than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better pixel count per inch in the screen and a lot higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG V30S ThinQ's camera is very similar to LG K52's camera, because although the LG V30S ThinQ has a camera in the back with much less megapixels and a lot tinier camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better images and video in low light environments and a way higher (4K) video resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG K52, and although they both have a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The LG K52 counts with greater battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.