Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-11-23 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K52 is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force, with a 76 score against 75.8. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG K52 has older 10 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. The LG K52 construction is much newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than the Motorola Moto Z Force.
The Moto Z Force features a more vivid screen than LG K52, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with way more pixels per inch in the display and a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Motorola Moto Z Force's storage capacity for apps and games is just as good as the LG K52 one, both have a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and exactly the same internal memory.
The LG K52 counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the LG K52 also has a larger number of cores. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a little bit better camera than LG K52, because although it has a much lower resolution camera, and they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Moto Z Force also counts with a lot higher video resolution.
LG K52 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.