Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-11-23 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z3 has an overall score of 77.6, which is slightly better than the LG K52's score of 76. These phones include Android OS, but Motorola Moto Z3 has a newer 9.0 Pie version while LG K52 has Android 10, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features. Motorola Moto Z3's construction is thinner and somewhat lighter than LG K52, although it was released many years before.
The Motorola Moto Z3 has a better display than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with way more pixels per inch in the screen and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels. The Moto Z3 and LG K52 count with similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, they have exactly the same internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z3 features a little better hardware performance than LG K52. Both have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The LG K52 has a bit better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rates, the LG K52 also has a much bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality photos, a bigger camera aperture to take better captures in low-light situations and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The LG K52 has superior battery life than Moto Z3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.