Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-23 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has an overall score of 80, which is slightly better than LG K52's global score of 76. Although it's the best phone in this review, the Motorola One Zoom construction is older, a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than the LG K52. Motorola One Zoom has a slightly better looking screen than LG K52, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a much better pixels density.
LG K52 has a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Zoom. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Motorola One Zoom features a much better camera than LG K52, and although they both have a 0.5 inches sensor and the same resolution back-facing camera, the Motorola One Zoom also has a bigger aperture and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
LG K52 counts with a better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola One Zoom's battery life is just as good as LG K52's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.