Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-23 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 is slightly better than LG K52, with a score of 81.3 against 76. The Galaxy A31 body is just a little lighter but just a bit thicker than LG K52, and both of them were released only a few months apart. Both phones in this comparison review have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System).
Samsung Galaxy A31 has a sharper display than LG K52, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher pixel density and a way higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. The LG K52 has a much bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG K52 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG K52 has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A31. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A31 captures a bit better pictures and videos than LG K52, although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or video in low light situations, they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the same video frame rates, a back facing camera with a 48 megapixels and the same back-facing camera sensor size.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has improved battery lifetime than LG K52, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.